{"id":22111,"date":"2024-04-29T08:00:24","date_gmt":"2024-04-29T06:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/?p=22111"},"modified":"2024-04-30T10:57:11","modified_gmt":"2024-04-30T08:57:11","slug":"the-more-things-change-the-more-they-stay-the-same","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/the-more-things-change-the-more-they-stay-the-same\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cThe More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same?\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

At V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog, we<\/a> have<\/a> quite<\/a> frequently<\/a> wondered<\/a> about<\/a> time<\/a>, speed, timing, and temporalities. For example, when drafting an editorial for a ten-year anniversary, there is considerable temptation initially to divide the text into neat sections between \u201cthe past\u201d, \u201cthe present\u201d, and \u201cthe future\u201d. However, at second glance, we \u2013 meaning the blog\u2019s current Co-Editors-in-Chief Su\u00e9 Gonz\u00e1lez Hauck, Meike Krakau, and Isabel Lischewski \u2013 find that such a division is actually almost impossible.<\/p>\n

After all, the development of an institution such as a blog does happen in fits and starts and sometimes painful growth spurts, but at the same time often so slowly and gradually that it is all but unnoticeable at first. Oftentimes, we have furthermore made the experience that we thought we were debating the introduction of radically new policies at the blog only to realize that we were in fact rehashing year-old discussions. Time is, indeed, a flat circle, and progress is not linear \u2013 but possible and indeed imperative.<\/p>\n

Case in point, many of our still-current team members, including Su\u00e9 and Isabel, joined V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog in mid-2019, when the blog staff almost doubled in size, marking an important growth spurt and a decisive move towards more professionalization. Four and a half years later, in late 2023, we grew our team once more by twelve new editors, mirroring the \u201cbig extension\u201d of 2019 \u2013 but this time with a focus on diversity and internationalization much honed since then.<\/p>\n

Despite our increased internationalization, at V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog, we never tried to hide the fact that we are and remain situated in a very specific, i.e. the German-speaking, legal tradition<\/a>. Even though we now predominantly publish posts in English and have a wide international readership, we never considered changing our \u2018unpronounceable\u2019 name and even made the \u201c\u00d6\u201d Umlaut<\/em> our logo. This is our way of acknowledging that knowledge production is always situated. In the very first blog post published on V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog, Dana Schmalz and Michael Riegner stated<\/a> that one of the goals of this new platform would be to express the autonomy and uniqueness of international law scholarship in the German-speaking world while also fostering dialogue \u2013 with other legal and adjacent disciplines and with international debates surrounding international law. We remain committed to this goal.<\/p>\n

Running and funding an academic blog continues to come with its privileges as well as precarities. Like so many other institutions who are part of the Open Knowledge and Open Access movement, we still mainly rely on volunteer work. A certain degree of professionalization has been made possible mainly since we were able to secure a grant by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation).\u00a0 We are still searching for a more sustainable model to finance our work. After all, being able to have at least some paid positions is not only a matter of professionalization but also of removing barriers within legal academia. If you want to support our work and help us keep our technological infrastructure running we always welcome d\u00d6nations<\/a> of any kind, true to the motto: those who can for those who can\u2019t.<\/p>\n

As we prepared for our grand anniversary, we could not help but reflect on all the developments and changes the blog has gone through. And just as the blog has changed and evolved considerably in recent years, so too has international law itself. To mark the occasion, we invited the authors of some of our most outstanding and widely read articles to reflect on them once again. Some of these articles concern past developments which, unfortunately, have lost nothing of their currentness \u2013 such as the fact that our ten-year anniversary almost coincides with that of Russia\u2018s 2014 invasion of Crimea. Others play with the format and idea of a blogpost or contain self-reflection by the authors on how their own approach to writing may have changed over the years.<\/p>\n

Beyond the blog, as behooves a Germany-based legal institution, we\u2018re also celebrating our anniversary with the publication of an edited volume. In subverting the idea of the classic German \u201eFestschrift\u201c as a commermorative publication for a person and as a symbol for the established ways of \u201edoing\u201c German legal academia, we want to create a \u201eFestschrift\u201c for an idea: the idea of turning established hierarchies on their heads; of moving away from prototype imagination of an isolated scholarly genius; of opening access to legal science in more than one way; of setting new parameters for scientific debates and of fusing open-mindedness and academic rigor. A big thank you to everyone who continues to make this project a reality. Look out for our \u201eFestschrift\u201c – coming in September 2024!<\/p>\n

A decade of international legal blogging would not have been possible without the help of so many wonderful people, both at the centre of the day-to-day action and in the background providing us with invaluable help and advice throughout the highs and lows of making and finding our own way in legal academia. As it would border on the impossible to mention everyone by name, we would like to begin by thanking all of our peer reviewers<\/a> and academic advisors who ensure that the high academic standards we set for ourselves at V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog continue to be upheld. We\u2019d also like to give a shout-out to our publishers<\/a>, who actively support us in our efforts to professionalize and further develop the blog. A huge thank you to our incredible authors<\/a> from all over the globe, who keep surprising and delighting us with their work and deep legal insights every day. Our editorial team, consisting largely of volunteers, remains the backbone and engine of this blog, the source of sheer endless creativity and motivation, for which we are beyond grateful.<\/p>\n

And finally, we want to thank you \u2013 our readers \u2013 for being a vital part of our journey and making this project possible. On to the next ten!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

At V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog, we have quite frequently wondered about time, speed, timing, and temporalities. For example, when drafting an editorial for a ten-year anniversary, there is considerable temptation initially to divide the text into neat sections between \u201cthe past\u201d, \u201cthe present\u201d, and \u201cthe future\u201d. However, at second glance, we \u2013 meaning the blog\u2019s current Co-Editors-in-Chief Su\u00e9 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6639],"tags":[],"authors":[5621,6899,3947],"article-categories":[3572],"doi":[],"class_list":["post-22111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","authors-isabel-lischewski","authors-meike-krakau","authors-sue-gonzalez-hauck","article-categories-symposium"],"acf":{"subline":""},"meta_box":{"doi":"10.17176\/20240429-185121-0"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22111"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22111\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22114,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22111\/revisions\/22114"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22111"},{"taxonomy":"authors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/authors?post=22111"},{"taxonomy":"article-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article-categories?post=22111"},{"taxonomy":"doi","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/doi?post=22111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}