Appreciating the (sometimes) necessary moment of pausing, hesitating, and dwelling in reflection, staying open to revisiting an argument and allowing oneself to look at a problem from different angles has always been at the heart of V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog. Part of practicing this reflexivity always also included contemplating our role as a blog in the publication landscape of academia. Indeed, reflecting about one\u2019s role and responsibility as a publication outlet appears ever-more timely in light of the growing number of global crises of which the heinous attack of Hamas on Israeli civilians of 7 October and the ongoing suffering of civilians in Gaza and Israel might only be the latest aggravation.<\/p>\n
Reflecting \u2013 of course \u2013 can mean many different things and the outcomes of reflection processes are never predetermined. Sometimes we may even be forced to acknowledge that we will just have to continue pondering over what occupies our minds\u2026 However, during the past couple of months some of these reflections at V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog have (re-)surfaced and taken more concrete shape and form.<\/p>\n
Reflections Taking Shape<\/strong><\/p>\n First of all, they took shape in deciding to expand and diversify our Team. Until 10 November you have the opportunity to join us<\/a> and become part of the new generation of V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog, shaping the face of V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog for the future.<\/p>\n There are already some wonderful additions to the Team. Emma Eder<\/a> and Carlotta Musiol<\/a> will now be supporting us as student assistants. We are thrilled to welcome you on Board! Further, our Podcast Team was recently reinforced by Jan-Henrik Hinselmann<\/a>.<\/p>\n In the past month\u2019s episode, the Podcast Team and Andreas Kulick invited us<\/a> to think with them about the consequences of states disregarding international courts. They explored if and how terming these developments as a \u201cBacklash\u201d provides an appropriate language to talk about the phenomenon and in how far insights from legal theory or disciplines adjacent to international law may prove (more) helpful. This month\u2019s episode forthcoming episode on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Jan, Isabel and Erik have invited Lys Kulamadayil<\/a> to reflect with them on ableism<\/a> in the college of international lawyers.<\/p>\n Secondly, and reflecting on more personal aspects of living a life as an academic, Sissy, chatting with Tamsin Philippa Paige<\/a>, Thoko Kaime<\/a> and Angelika Nu\u00dfberger<\/a> provided us with no less than three more inspiring (and fun!) portraits of person(s) behind the academic<\/a>.<\/p>\n Thirdly, with the carefully curated Symposium on the AjVR-DGIR Conference \u201cProgress and International Law \u2013 A Cursed Relationship?<\/a>\u201d, our brilliant guest editors<\/a> led us into yet another rabbit hole of reflections. The stimulating conversations we were able to read and listen to throughout the symposium quickly distracted us from initial feelings of unsettling and discomfort that the question of the conference theme may evoke.<\/p>\n And there is still more to come. In the weeks to come you will have the chance to enjoy reflections on Panos Merkouris\u2019,\u00a0J\u00f6rg Kammerhofer\u2019s and Noora Araj\u00e4rvi\u2019s\u00a0book \u201cThe Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International\u00a0Law<\/a>\u201d and Patryk I. Labuda\u2019s\u00a0 \u201cInternational Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability – In the Court’s Shadow<\/a>\u201d in two Book Review Symposia on V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog.<\/p>\n From Reflections to Reflecti\u00d6ns<\/strong><\/p>\n This month, finally, the outcome of another long reflection process about how to make V\u00f6lkerrechtsblog an even more lively forum for scholarly debate eventually took shape. We are delighted to be able to introduce reflecti\u00d6ns<\/strong>, a novel open-ended review format on the blog<\/a>. The aim of reflecti\u00d6ns<\/strong> is to explore together how different publication formats can best complement each other. Instead of conflating them and\/or pitting them against each other we wish to highlight how blog posts can function as a prism and junction of scholarly debate \u2013 making visible and connecting scholarship of the past with ideas of the future.<\/p>\n For reflecti\u00d6ns<\/strong> we invite you to either submit proposals for scholarly pieces to be featured and discussed on the blog or respond to calls for reflecti\u00d6n<\/strong>s that we will be issuing.<\/p>\n For our first edition of reflecti\u00d6ns<\/strong> are going to invite you to reflect on ideas on Ordering \/ Disordering International Law, taking on Michelle Staggs Kelsall\u2019s \u201cDisordering International Law<\/a>\u201d, published in the European Journal of International Law (EJIL) last year, as our starting point.<\/p>\n