{"id":15073,"date":"2021-08-25T08:00:24","date_gmt":"2021-08-25T06:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/?p=15073"},"modified":"2021-08-30T10:31:30","modified_gmt":"2021-08-30T08:31:30","slug":"martti-koskenniemis-german-legal-imagination-and-the-politics-of-panorama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/martti-koskenniemis-german-legal-imagination-and-the-politics-of-panorama\/","title":{"rendered":"Martti Koskenniemi\u2019s (German) Legal Imagination and the Politics of Panorama"},"content":{"rendered":"

Earlier this summer, on a long car trip that took me from my hometown of Seligenstadt am Main (a small but significant lieu de m\u00e9moire<\/em> of that very idea of Roman-European translatio imperii<\/em> that features repeatedly in Martti Koskenniemi’s new book) to Berlin, my GPS directed me to and through Halle, to avoid heavy traffic on my usual route. Stopping at a red traffic light on the monstrous highway that the GDR bureaucracy had built right through the historical city center, I found myself standing in front of the main building of the Francke\u2019sche Stiftungen (Francke Foundations), an empire of schools, hospitals, children’s homes, kindergartens, churches, museums, libraries, and collections that the Protestant theologian, pastor and educator August Hermann Francke had founded in 1695. It was the day before Ascension Day, when in Christian churches the paragraph from Acts 1:8 is read that, as quoted in John Donne’s famous 1622 Sermon to the Virginia Company, has given the book its title: To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Waiting for green lights in front of Francke\u2019s missionary empire, founded the year after the establishment of the University of Halle by elector Frederick III of Brandenburg, I thought of the illuminating, beautifully written and wonderfully readable book in my trunk – which yet seemed almost impossible to review. Its proof pages traveled with me several more times across Germany during this summer, from Heidelberg via Seligenstadt to Berlin, through the Fulda Gap, past Gotha, Erfurt, Weimar, Jena, Halle, Leipzig, Dessau, and Potsdam. And back. Most of these places were familiar. But as a seasoned ICE traveler in pre-pandemic times, I had seen and accessed them always from the same old angles. Now, suddenly beyond my familiar railroad tracks, I took the chance to visit and revisit familiar and less familiar places during travel breaks, while trying to find a roadmap through Martti Koskenniemi’s monumental volume.<\/p>\n

“Imagining starts at home”, he writes (p. 8), and that short sentence captures the book’s entire agenda. Or at least one of its many agendae, gesturing towards current debates on comparative international law. In any case, it reflects my mindset as a reader and reviewer, as I shall reflect on a very European, indeed decidedly Eurocentric book in this blog post, on a striking example of reflexive situatedness, its possibilities and limits. Since the museums, churches, libraries, and collections along my West-East route had often been closed in recent months, and since I have not crossed any international borders since January 2020, getting out of the car in well-known-yet-unknown places and spaces sometimes prompted imaginations, new and old. In the following I will share some of these imaginations. And of course, as promised to the conveners of this symposium, comment on Part IV of the book, “Germany”. Will there be just unrelated bits and pieces, disjointed fragments? Well, c’est bricolage<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Beyond Realism<\/strong><\/p>\n

Once upon a time, in the East. On a barren hill in the north of Thuringia, on the Schlachtberg near Bad Frankenhausen, in the shadow of the Kyffh\u00e4user mountains, the painter Werner T\u00fcbke<\/a> was wrestling with a project of extraordinary scope and ambition. T\u00fcbke, a leading member of the \u2018Leipzig School\u2019 transcending the strict confinements of Socialist Realism, had been commissioned by the Ministry of Culture of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) to create a panorama in the best bourgeois traditions of 19th-century nationalist identity-building, marking the 450th anniversary of the German Peasants\u2019 War, in 1974-75. As recorded in the files of his clients, the circular panorama (spanning 14 metres by 123 metres, one of the largest monumental works in the visual arts of the twentieth century) should \u201caim to be a work of art that was monumental in both its relevance and design\u201d<\/a>. T\u00fcbkes Bauernkriegspanorama Bad Frankenhausen. Monumentalbild \u201cFr\u00fchb\u00fcrgerliche Revolution in Deutschland\u201d<\/em><\/a> (Peasants\u2019 War Panorama Bad Frankenhausen. Monumental Painting “Early Bourgeois Revolution in Germany”) attests to the artist\u2019s impressive erudition, creativity, and intellectual independence.<\/p>\n

The supposedly heroic story of the Peasants\u2019 War, the people\u2019s uprising against their oppressors, is turned into a captivating, anarchic theatrum mundi<\/em>, depicting apocalyptic social and religious conflicts, and the ruptures and transformations of renaissance and reformation. During his intense 12-years commitment to the project, T\u00fcbke delved deep into 16th century art and history \u2013 and replaced the linear-progressivist teleology of his sponsors with a cyclic concept of history, subverting any theological or ideological promise of salvation. Giving visual form to his more than 3000 protagonists became for T\u00fcbke, particularly in the case of the central figure of Thomas M\u00fcntzer, an almost autobiographical exercise. By 1979, when the gigantesque canvas woven in one piece in the textile factory in Sursk, Soviet Union, had arrived in Frankenhausen, the master had produced, as Eckhart Gillen has counted<\/a>, 143 drawings, 5 watercolors, 16 chalk lithographs and 11 paintings as \u2018early versions\u2019, exploring his narratives, perspectives, and the complex interrelations between the painting\u2019s core scenes and protagonists.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, fifteen hundred kilometres north-northeast, a young Finnish lawyer had just embarked on a career in diplomatic service (and, as it would soon turn out, in international law), in these bleak years of the Cold War. His sobering experiences as a practitioner in New York, Geneva, and The Hague prompted him to reconstruct \u201cthe argumentative architecture of international law in its many variations, (\u2026) an account of it as a language and a professional competence\u201d<\/a>. In September 1989, when the Frankenhausen Panorama was finally opened to the public, the republic it was meant to celebrate shaken by peaceful protest, Martti Koskenniemi had just successfully defended and published his doctoral thesis From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument<\/em>, and \u201cit became an instant classic in the analysis of law\u2019s rhetorical structures\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Another Era, Another Monument<\/strong><\/p>\n

32 years later, on the brink of yet another era of international (dis)order, another instant classic by the Finnish master has seen the light of the day. And we have seen the light of his day, in this summer of a global pandemic and regional floods and fires, entering Martti Koskenniemi\u00b4s Panorama for a first glimpse onto the monumental canvas of his international legal imagination.<\/p>\n

Browsing through the 1107 pages of the proof, skimming the table of contents, at first, I thought that I had before me the central panel of a large tryptich: the missing link between From Apology to Utopia<\/em> and The Gentle Civilizer of Nations<\/em>, Koskenniemi\u2019s 2001 instant classic that strongly influenced international law\u2019s much discussed (and theorized), profoundly transformative \u2018historiographical turn\u2019<\/a>. Indeed, with its focus on legal imagining, on \u201claw as bricolage<\/em>\u201d, \u201cthe combination of materials lying around in order to persuade those whose opinions and words matter\u201d (p. 958), the Uttermost Parts of the Earth <\/em>builds on its author\u2019s seminal work on international law as language, and analysis of its rhetorical structures and argumentative practices. As \u201ca history of the legal imagination as it sought to capture actions of policies with consequences outside the domestic sphere during roughly the period 1300 \u2013 1870\u201d (p. 2), the book is also, in certain respects, a prequel to the (hi)story of modern international law as told in The Gentle Civilizer of Nations<\/em>.<\/p>\n

And yet, there is so much more going on here. We see familiar takes and ideas, motifs and narrations from the author\u2019s two preceding opera magna as well as bits and pieces of \u2018early versions\u2019 he published during the last 15 years or so, rearranged into a monumental panorama, in forceful and imaginative historiographical moves which can also be described with Claude L\u00e9vi-Strauss\u2019 structuralist term bricolage<\/em>, as introduced by Martti Koskenniemi as a description of international legal imagining tout court<\/em> (p. 2). His global audience, now pouring into CUP\u2019s carefully protected architectures of knowledge production, eagerly climbing up the stairs to the gigantesque dome of Koskenniemi\u2019s Panorama, will marvel at all the erudite details and astute observations, point out blind spots and dark corners, and imaginative bricolage<\/em> will go on as we are gathering outside, at the end of an impressive intellectual tour de force, discussing our own first impressions and imaginations.<\/p>\n

To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth<\/em> is a monument of sorts, another \u2018last treatise\u2019 from Helsinki that will shape our understanding of international law and power as we might have reached the end of another era, also of international legal imagination. It offers a rich intellectual history of the field, and it would be tempting to delve into methodological explorations, or to set out on an analysis of conceptual shifts this project underwent during the years of its gestation \u2013 for example, from a focus on capitalism in initial stages<\/a> towards more dynamic, situated, yet also more ambivalent narratives connecting the fix points of property and sovereignty (p. 958-959). Or to engage in comparisons with other histories of the field, among them the book of another diplomat and historian of international law, Wilhelm Grewe\u2019s Epochs of International Law, <\/em>\u201ca book of exceptional importance and influence\u201d<\/a>, as Bardo Fassbender wrote in his 2002 essay marking the book\u2019s publication in English.<\/p>\n

International Law as a German Discipline<\/strong><\/p>\n

However, I have been kindly invited by the editors of this symposium to offer some thoughts on Part IV of the volume (chapters 11 and 12), dedicated to the development of international legal imagination in \u201cGermany\u201d (as that part is titled, in a slightly anachronistic way \u2013 after all, we are encountering the German nation state only in the second part of chapter 12, following our explorations in the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation<\/em>), discussing \u201cthe transformations of German academic vocabulary of ius naturae et gentium<\/em> from a Protestant technique of advice to princes to a rationalist philosophy of statehood on the one hand and an empirical science of society on the other\u201d (p. 10-11). Martti Koskenniemi has long argued that \u201cinternational law is a specifically German discipline\u201d, and these two chapters provide a detailed and erudite reconstruction of the \u2018grammar\u2019 of international law as inheritance of \u201cthe constitutional struggles of the German-Roman Empire\u201d (p. 800). His \u201cGermany\u201d describes not an epoch in the never-ending power struggles for global hegemony, but an intellectual space where influential individuals, princes and (their) professors, develop legal imaginations and conceptual languages for European modernities with global impact and outreach. To Koskenniemi, the Reich<\/em> is not of interest as a political Grossraum<\/em> (as for Grewe, the \u201cAtlantic Realist<\/a>\u201d), but merely as a plural and fragmented political sphere, a legal-intellectual constellation where \u201cthe problem of fitting the sovereign equality of individual princes to the overall structure of an empire\u201d (p. 11) is constantly addressed and negotiated.<\/p>\n

Inspired by the conceptual frames of a Wissenschaftsgeschichte des \u00f6ffentlichen Rechts<\/em> (History of Public Law Science) as developed by the late Frankfurt legal historian Michael Stolleis in his 4-volume opus magnum Geschichte des \u00f6ffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland<\/em><\/a>, and drawing from Stolleis\u2019 seminal work on the ius publicum<\/em> of the early modern era, Martti Koskenniemi introduces his readers to \u201cthe palatial world of German public law that I still think provides the historical frame for much of international law as we know it.\u201c (xiv). The world of German public law that To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth<\/em> takes us to is, however, not a world of courts and palaces, but first and foremost a world of universities. Zooming in on the leading universities of the enlightenment, Halle (1694) and G\u00f6ttingen (1734), and on their academic stars Thomasis, Wolff, Gundling, Schmauss, Achenwall, Justi, and Martens, we witness en d\u00e9tail the \u201cmigration of authority between theology, law, politics and economics but also their intermixture at particular moments for particular purposes\u201d (p. 955) that forms one of the three \u201clarge stories\u201d woven into the book\u2019s narrative texture, appropriately named by its author with Kant\u2019s term \u201cthe contest of the faculties\u201d. Along the way, we have of course also met Samuel Pufendorf, on \u201cthe first chair in \u2019natural law and the law of nations\u2019, established in the Heidelberg philosophy faculty in 1661 and designed for teaching \u2018according to Grotius\u2019\u201d (p. 816), and we see Vattel work on his \u201celaboration of developments in German natural law no longer limited to the German context\u201d (p. 865).<\/p>\n

State Machines and the End of Natural Law<\/strong><\/p>\n

To the Uttermost Parts <\/em>has long been announced (and awaited) as (also) a history of a political economy of international law. Martti Koskenniemi\u2019s focus on the metaphor of the \u2018State-Machine\u2019 (and its science), as first illustrated by Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger in her work on the rationalisation of the absolute state in the enlightenment era, mirrors his strong interest in the holistic nature of the natural law-based ius publicum<\/em> of the Holy Roman Empire, the Reichsstaatsrecht<\/em>. \u201cGerman natural law encompassed both international and domestic action to search for security and welfare. Its ambition was to produce a total view of how the state machine was to be operated; the Holy Roman Empire, after all, had been both domestic and international\u201d (p. 866). But there is more than the lens of political economy: the \u2018State-Machine\u2019 and one of its most influential theorists, Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, lead the reader also to \u201cThe End of Natural Law\u201d, in chapter 12, a chapter that \u201ctraces the transformation of natural law into four languages that would take its place in the 19th century and beyond: the languages of empirical political science (Schmauss), economics (Justi), critical philosophy (Kant) and modern law of nations (Martens)\u201d (p. 877).<\/p>\n

While Koskenniemi has rightly (and extensively) highlighted the important influence of the Prussian Kings, in particular Frederick II, on these developments, another royal patron of the idea of the enlightened \u201cState-Machine\u201d and its theorists is only mentioned once, and in passing (p. 851): the Habsburg Empress Maria Theresia, a seasoned expert and practitioner of the ius publicum universale et gentium<\/em><\/a> who preferably hired lawyers and other officials trained at the new Protestant reform universities (among them Justi, who taught for some years at the Theresianum<\/em> in Vienna), and \u2013 while sceptical about \u2018modernist\u2019 enlightenment philosophy \u2013 promoted the establishment of natural law and international law also in the Catholic universities of the Reich.<\/em> Anna Amalia of Brunswick-Wolfenb\u00fcttel, Duchess of Sachsen-Weimar and regent of the states of Saxe-Weimar and Saxe-Eisenach from 1758 to 1775, might be one other example of powerful and learned female readers of Reichsverfassungsrecht <\/em>in the German princely courts. A generation later, Rahel Varnhagen, Henriette Herz and Caroline Schelling hosted and curated in their salons conversations on law and politics, with Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Friedrich Carl von Savigny among their habitual guests. Maybe the formative \u2018German era\u2019\u00a0of international legal imagination was not as exclusively a world of white privileged European men as Koskenniemi\u2019s narrative has it, and if we count in Moses Mendelssohn, the towering figure of German and Jewish enlightenment (also a noted scholar of natural law<\/a> whom Kant called a \u2018Rechtsforscher\u2019<\/em>\u00a0\u2013 a legal scholar), then it was also not exclusively Christian (Varnhagen and Herz were also of Jewish origin). Anton Wilhelm Amo<\/a>, an African philosopher originally from what is now Ghana and the first African-born person known to have attended a European university, professor of philosophy at the universities of Halle and Jena after studying there, might be another protagonist to include in a broader picture.<\/p>\n

The Last Thing to Perish<\/strong><\/p>\n

However, these are suggestions for another panorama, for future reconfigurations in the never-ending bricolage<\/em> of international legal imagination. And it surely seems a bit nit-picky to propose such additions here. But we should keep alternative stories and protagonists in mind, as we emerge from the panorama of Koskenniemi\u2019s monumental European theatrum mundi<\/em>, a lecture hall and courtroom, forum and battlefield that will shape and inspire international legal imagination for a long time. After all, a panorama is not only a project, but a world-making machine creating imaginations for generations. The painter Werner T\u00fcbke, in his apocalyptic pictorial worlds a more somber mind than the sober idealist Martti Koskenniemi, once declared to his communist patrons<\/a>, not without self-confidence, that when the world finally came to an end and everything was already burned to cinder, his art would be the last thing to perish.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Earlier this summer, on a long car trip that took me from my hometown of Seligenstadt am Main (a small but significant lieu de m\u00e9moire of that very idea of Roman-European translatio imperii that features repeatedly in Martti Koskenniemi’s new book) to Berlin, my GPS directed me to and through Halle, to avoid heavy traffic […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6639],"tags":[],"authors":[3661],"article-categories":[3572],"doi":[],"class_list":["post-15073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","authors-alexandra-kemmerer","article-categories-symposium"],"acf":{"subline":""},"meta_box":{"doi":"10.17176\/20210825-112601-0"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15073"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15073\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15143,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15073\/revisions\/15143"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15073"},{"taxonomy":"authors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/authors?post=15073"},{"taxonomy":"article-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article-categories?post=15073"},{"taxonomy":"doi","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voelkerrechtsblog.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/doi?post=15073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}